Newsroom

Routing for fleet electrification

Newsroom

Routing for fleet electrification

Newsroom

Routing for fleet electrification

How planning replaces guesswork

When fleets begin electrification, most of the complexity is assumed to sit at the charger. Hardware, kW ratings, depot layout and plug availability tend to dominate the conversation. In reality, charging is where the vehicle stops, not where the strategy starts. The real difficulty comes earlier. It is in the question every fleet asks before buying vehicles or installing infrastructure.

Will our routes work?

This question sits at the core of fleet electrification. A charging network cannot answer it. Navigation software cannot answer it. The only way to know is to model routes, energy consumption and operational patterns before the first vehicle leaves the depot. That capability belongs to routing, and without routing electrification is based on assumptions rather than evidence.

Route simulation comes first

Most fleets still make electrification decisions using averages. Average route length, average weather, average payload. Averages are easy to work with, but real fleets do not run on averages. They run on specific roads, at specific speeds, on specific days, carrying cargo that may be light one morning and heavy the next.

Routing offers the ability to simulate real routes before committing to infrastructure. It shows which shifts can run without mid-day charging, where battery reserves fall short, and how weather or gradients change feasibility. It highlights where a charging pause is needed to protect the schedule. It also uncovers where electrification is already possible without additional investment.

With simulation, planning moves from speculation to measurement. Electrification becomes a project that can be modelled, costed and defended.

Charging becomes scheduled instead of improvised

Without clarity around the route , most fleets begin every shift at 100 percent just to be safe. This is a rational response to uncertainty, but it increases energy cost and creates unnecessary depot congestion. Routing replaces that uncertainty with precision by calculating the ideal start-of-day state of charge for each trip. A local courier circuit might require only 60 percent. A regional loop may need 85. A refrigerated delivery on a hot day may demand more.

Once operators know the number, they can plan charging based on need rather than habit. Vehicles leave with the correct amount of energy, not a full battery by default. Overnight charging requirements shrink, grid load is smoother and cost forecasting becomes far more predictable.

Charging becomes a planned step, not an interruption

Drivers are often asked to make charging decisions on the road. This works for personal use but introduces risk into commercial operations. If a charger is busy, offline or incompatible, the entire route shifts. Recovery becomes reactive, time is lost, and customer commitments become uncertain.

Routing prevents this by placing charging inside the route plan itself. The driver receives clear instructions that include where to charge, how long to stay and how much energy to take on. If payload, weather or traffic conditions change, the plan adapts using the live state of charge. This wat the charging becomes one line in the timetable rather than a disruption to it.

Private, public and partner charging operate as one network

Fleets rarely rely on a single charging source. Depot AC may cover night charging, public DC may fill gaps during the day and partner locations may be used to support specific corridors. Without routing, these resources compete instead of combine. Drivers select whatever appears closest on a map, even if it is slower, more expensive or unnecessary.

Routing connects these sources into a single operational network. Decisions are based on time, cost and availability rather than proximity. In practice, this means fewer detours, fewer unknowns and far more predictable energy budgets. Charging becomes an integrated part of fleet operations rather than an external dependency.

What this unlocks for fleet platforms

Routing is not navigation for electrification. Navigation guides vehicles on the road. Routing determines whether the route is viable in the first place and how energy should be used to complete it.

For an FMS platform, routing opens a new layer of value. It makes it possible to help fleets:

 • simulate viability before adoption
• calculate required charge for each shift
• reduce overcharging and depot congestion
• insert charging into dispatch instructions instead of leaving it to drivers
• optimise across private, public and partner charging locations
• adjust plans based on live battery conditions
• understand cost and emissions per route rather than per fleet

Electrification grows with certainty, not optimism

Fleets do not need more chargers to electrify. They need confidence. The transition succeeds when operators can answer simple questions with certainty: Will the route finish on time. Where does charging fit, how much energy does each job require, and what infrastructure is genuinely necessary.

Routing provides those answers. It replaces guessing and estimates with planning and makes electrification predictable instead of experimental. For fleets and the platforms that support them, that is the difference between adoption in principle and adoption in volume.

Building tools for fleets? We can help you add predictable EV planning.
Contact Sales.

Chargetrip is a mission-driven technology company helping the world transition to electric mobility.

Subscribe for monthly perspectives from Chargetrip leadership.

© Chargetrip B.V

Chargetrip is a mission-driven technology company helping the world transition to electric mobility.

Subscribe for monthly perspectives from Chargetrip leadership.

© Chargetrip B.V

Chargetrip is a mission-driven technology company helping the world transition to electric mobility.

Subscribe for monthly perspectives from Chargetrip leadership.

© Chargetrip B.V